top of page

John Penrose MP: How energy market reform can cut bills and leave Putin fuming


John Penrose MP (Weston-super-Mare)

Well, thanks a lot, Vladimir. The cold weather is here and, with energy bills being used to put the West under pressure for supporting Ukraine, every family and business has to be miles more careful with the heating than normal. Add in the lingering symptoms of the pandemic disrupting global supply chains and fuelling inflation everywhere, and it’s pretty much a perfect storm.


But there are still things we can do to minimise the problems. To start with, the Government is providing a lot of help with subsidies to make everyone’s energy bill a bit more

manageable. But it’s ferociously expensive and, ultimately, switching the pain from our

energy bills to our tax bills is only moving costs from one pocket to another. It’s enormously

valuable and desperately needed immediate help, but it’s still a short-term sticking plaster

rather than a permanent cure.  


So what’s the long term answer? The fundamental problem is that, even though we’ve built

loads more cheap, green renewable energy generation in Britain over the last decade or

more, those lower costs aren’t showing up in our energy bills. We’ve got to carry on building

even more renewable energy because it makes us less dependent on European gas prices

and helps us get to our Net Zero targets too. But that won’t be enough on its own. I’ve just

published a series of recommendations in a recent review called “Unfinished Revolution”

and, if we get on with them quickly, they ought to provide the kinds of long-term answers

which will make families warmer, cut businesses’ costs and leave Mr Putin fuming too.


Firstly, to update the system and directly lower energy bills, local residents could be offered

discounted electricity if their community gives democratic consent for building new energy

kit, whether it’s a new wind or solar farm, or a line of pylons, or a big battery facility to store

power for later. They wouldn’t have to agree if they didn’t want to – that’s democracy, after

all – but plenty would conclude that the lower bills were worth it. And everyone would benefit

because the overall costs for the country as a whole would be miles lower too.


Those discounts would help with the second essential reform: unlocking local agreement to

new infrastructure to speed up our incredibly expensive, slow, uncertain and risky planning

system. At the moment it imposes unwanted developments on communities that hate them.

And it takes years too: at  the moment new green electricity generators have to wait 10 years

before they can connect to the power grid. The only people who do well out of it are the

enormous and growing armies of lawyers and planning consultants who earn vast fees and a

fat living out of making this lumbering, wheezing, over-complicated machine move ever-so-

slowly forward. The whole thing needs to be much faster, simpler and cheaper, with

democratic community consent outranking legal appeals instead.


Next, the way energy companies are charged for getting power from their generators to

families and companies needs to reward the ones that do it well. That means charging less

for firms that have generators close to their customers, because it minimises transmission

losses in getting electricity to them. And charging less for firms that match their power

generation to their customers’ needs most closely throughout each day, so there’s less strain

and cost for the transmission grid to soak up, and lower costs for everyone overall too.


Finally, we’ve got to fix the price caps and social tariffs too. When prices start falling and the

Government’s schemes aren’t needed anymore, we can’t just go back to the way things

were before. We will still need a ‘relative’ price cap to stop energy firms from reintroducing

loyalty penalties which sneakily penalise loyal customers who don’t switch. And a small, tight

social tariff for the least well-off who are claiming benefits and who will still find energy

expensive even when Vladimir Putin has been put back in his box.


My original Government-commissioned Penrose Report came in the wake of covid and

before the invasion of Ukraine. Global context may have changed since 2020, but the need to

make the UK the most competitive place for investment, support consumers and future-proof

our energy system remains. There isn’t a moment to lose.

 

Views expressed in this blog are those of the author, not necessarily those of the Conservative Environment Network. If you are a CEN supporter, councillor, or parliamentarian and would like to write for the CEN blog, please email your idea to cameron@cen.uk.com.

Comments


bottom of page